Monday, 23 February 2015

Anti-TTIP Protest, Brussels, 3-4 February. Day 2








The second day started with the Trojan Horse Protest outside the European Commission. This protest was organised in cooperation with Friends of the Earth Europe, who made this video of the event. The speakers explain why TTIP is considered to be a Trojan Horse, and why we should protest against it.





After the protest, we all walked (yes, including me!) from the European Commission to the European Parliament, to meet with our Green MEPs.






Our Green MEPs are Jean LambertKeith Taylor and Molly Scott Cato. Here they are at a discussion chaired by a member of the German Greens. They were also joined by Plaid Cymru MEP Jill Evans, who sits in the European Parliament as a Green. (I could hardly believe that I was really in Brussels, attending a meeting at the European Parliament. And they provided us with lunch!)



The Green Group has consistently opposed TTIP from its inception, as have the Left groups, but apparently not the Social Democrats. The discussion involved pointing out that there is much more to TTIP  than a trade treaty, it is not merely about 'goods crossing borders'. As we had already learnt, it is more about lowering standards of environmental protection so as to increase the profits of multi-national organisations, There was more discussion on ISDS, to which we had been introduced on the previous day, and we were reminded of the fact that corporations can sue governments, but not the reverse.  The introduction of TTIP would mean multinational corporations making the laws, not governments, The measure of the special tribunal would be whether INVESTMENTS had been damaged.

Keith Taylor pointed out that bilateral trade agreements are only about money (profits), and wider social and environmental issues are routinely ignored. 
Molly Scott Cato also spoke on the theme of finance, pointing our that a 'trade' treaty is really a corporate power treaty, enabling corporations to move finance, not goods.The banks are still not properly regulated, but TTIP asks for reductions on regulation.

Jean Lambert reinforced the theme that had already  been discussed, that implementation of TTIP would pose a threat to the UK National Health Service and to public services in general (throughout the EU).

Jill Evans spoke on the threat to food safety standards, and the question of food labelling, Apparently there is very little food labelling in the US, and the treaty would require a reduction in the standards of safety and explicitness in food labelling in the EU. It is a very political issue! 




We then moved on to a discussion with Labour MEPs, led by David Martin, a Scottish MEP. The Labour group are less committed in their opposition to TTIP than the Green group, perhaps more prepared to give it consideration under certain circumstances, David Martin said that he did believe in 'free trade if possible, but only if it's fair'. He said that there could perhaps be a 'good' TTIP, which would be good for jobs and good for growth,  but it would have to enshrine labour rights in law. He claimed that the discussions have not reached the point where it's possible to be for or against TTIP since it is still 'a blank sheet of paper'. 

He then told a heckler, 'If you're not here to listen, just piss off', which some of us thought was quite funny, but he then had to apologise. The hecklers were quite annoying......how often does anyone get the chance to go to the European Parliament and discuss serious issues? 

That was the final meeting, and then we returned to London, with a lot to think about, and with the intention of continuing the campaign.

I'll just finish with something that  is not connected with the campaign, but I found rather amusing,....at one point a woman came up to me and asked where I was was from. I said, 'London - Green Left', and she said....'Oh...you're not from Shetland, then?' This is why!!



This was what I was wearing......I did indeed knit it for Shetland Wool Week, interesting that someone in Brussels recognised the design!!

Tuesday, 17 February 2015

Anti-TTIP Protest, Brussels, 3-4 February 2015, Day One







The protest against TTIP (Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership), was organised mainly by Global Justice Now38 degrees and War on Want. I went to represent Green Left.





 I must congratulate the organisers on the efficiency with which they  managed to get more than 100 people onto the right train and get us all to the right venue in Brussels. (Some, like myself, are elderly and disabled, and help was at hand). The venue was Mundo-B, which is a building ecologically renovated by a group of NGOs - it contains a conference centre, an organic cafe and organic garden.




I will outline as briefly as possible what TTIP is, and why we felt it was necessary to protest against it. It has been summed up by Global Justice Now as 'a race to the bottom, which doesn't pit the EU against the US, but people's rights against Big Business'. A good way of putting it....it is in fact intended as a corporate takeover. The outline here is taken from information supplied by Global Justice NowJean Lambert MEPMolly Scott Cato MEP and Keith Taylor, MEP.


In essence TTIP is a trade agreement between the US and the EU which increases the power of multinational corporations at the expense of the governments and populace of EU countries. The National Health Service of the UK is particularly at risk. 'The stated aims of TTIP are to remove trade barriers in relation to the buying and selling of goods and services between the EU and the US.If health services were not exempted from TTIP, it would cause them to be traded in much the same way.....Specific concerns that have been raised include whether TTIP would make it impossible to repeal existing health legislation which encourages marketisation of the NHS, the extent to which prospective public health measures (such as introducing plain packaging of tobacco products) would be under threat of legal challenge.......(Matthew Hamilton, Royal College of Nursing).

 Food standards and environmental protection would also be at risk were TTIP to be implemented.
'The EU and US have very different food standards, and some of the US food safety laws are much lower than those in the EU.
For example, products such as bleached chicken and hormone-fed cattle products are sold on the US market, whereas we are protected from such products here in the EU. In the EU we also have much more stringent restrictions on GMOs and pesticides......The US meat and dairy industries have very openly stated that they want to weaken provisions for animal welfare in the EU. They say these provisions are 'barriers to trade', but this is irrelevant. The provisions were introduced for a reason - the welfare of animals - and so they must remain in place.......the corporations driving the TTIP agenda were not elected to make our laws, and have not been given any public mandate to do so, For them, the end game is profit.....TTIP must be stopped in its tracks. (Keith Taylor, MEP).

I will conclude this introduction by drawing attention to the most insidious danger of TTIP, the Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS).This would give transnational corporations the power to sue European countries before secret arbitration tribunals, thus allowing US companies to bypass domestic European courts and sue for loss of profits from public policy decisions.
I am indebted for the following information to John Hilary, Chair of War on Want.

These are some examples of how companies have already used these powers.


1) US tobacco giant Philip Morris is suing the Australian government for billions of dollars in lost profits over the public health policy that all cigarettes must be sold in plain packaging.


2) Swedish energy company Vattenfall is suing the German government for 3.7 billion Euros over the country's decision to phase out nuclear power in the wake of the Fukusima nuclear disaster.


3) Veolia is suing the Egyptian government for loss of profits as a result of the county's decision to raise the minimum wage.


4) Ecuador has been ordered to pay Occidental Petrolium $1.77 billion in damages for terminating the oil giant's contract, even though the company had broken the law.



I will now turn to our protest. More than 100 people travelled to Brussels via Eurostar. On arrival in Brussels, we were taken on a walking tour of the corporate and lobbying quarter of Brussels - this visit was organised by Corporate Europe Observatory, who describe themselves as 'a research and campaign group working to expose and challenge the privileged access and influence enjoyed by corporations and their lobby groups in EU policy making'.

Because there were so many of us, we were divided into two groups - I elected to join the Food and Agriculture group. The other was Banking and Finance, but obviously there is an overlap, and we all ended up back together again in the Champs de Mars, the location of the 26 floor Bastion Tower, which houses the water and energy giant Suez, as well as several law firms and consultancies. (It is incredible how often we came up against corporate lawyers and consultancies!)




The Food and BioTech lobby operates through umbrella groups Eurobio and the European Seed Association. Biotech corporations including Monsanto, Syngenta, Pioneer, Bayer Cropscience, have their own lobbying offices in Brussels. According to the booklet provided by CEO, the biotech lobby want to get rid of the EU zero-tolerance policy for the presence of non-authorised GMOs in any imported food or feed.
The best known - and most hated - of the biotech corporations is Monsanto, which is based at 270, Avenue de Tervueren. The Monsanto Logo is no longer displayed on the front of the building, so it is possible that the company's decision makers are aware of the strength of feeling against them in the EU. Their website describes them as 'a sustainable agriculture company' which focuses on 'empowering farmers'.....whereas in fact the reverse is the truth.They are continuing to push for approval for RoundupReady soy in Europe - and also lobbies at the UN, pushing for GM soy to be recognised as climate-friendly. (This of course raises the whole question of soy and palm oil production!! I have included a link here to the Rainforest foundation, although this was not specifically on the anti-TTIP agenda).

Our attention was also drawn to Food and Drink Europe, which represents the multi-national food companies, including Uniliver, Kraft Foods, Coca-Cola and Mars. They were influential in a recent lobby battle over food labelling, campaigning to block consumer-friendly 'traffic light' labels - colour-coded labels for products containing high amounts of salt, sugar and fats. They succeeded in persuading MEPs that a voluntary approach involving guidelines would be preferable. The most recent entry on the their website reiterates this view.

There are many other influential lobby groups based in Brussels, including the all-important carbon lobby. Shell recently opened new premises on Rond-Point Schuman, a stone's throw from the European Commission. Both BP and Shell have lobbied to manipulate the EU's efforts to tackle climate change by promoting carbon trading as a solution.


After this fascinating, though tiring walk, we went to have a discussion and an evening meal with comrades and civil society activists, then returned to our various hotels.




Sunday, 7 December 2014

TRISTAN UND ISOLDE, Royal Opera House, 5 December 2014

Richard Wagner, TRISTAN UND ISOLDE
Royal Opera House, Covent Garden, Friday 5 December 2014










Cast

Sailor                                                           ED LYON
Isolde                                                          NINA STEMME
Brangaene                                                  SARAH CONNOLLY
Kurwenal                                                     IAIN PATERSON
Tristan                                                         STEPHEN GOULD
Melot                                                           NEAL COOPER
King Marke                                                 JOHN TOMLINSON
Shepherd                                                    GRAHAM CLARK
Steersman                                                  YURI YURCHUK

Chorus and Orchestra of the Royal Opera House, Covent Garden.

Conductor                                                    ANTONIO PAPPANO

Director                                                         CHRISTOF LOY


It is perhaps a good thing that TRISTAN UND ISOLDE is performed comparatively rarely, as it would be difficult to cope with the emotional strain of seeing and hearing it more than once a year! (Once every five years in the case of this production).

This is the second time I have seen the production, and I still love the actual staging - spare, minimalist, stripped to its essentials, so that the drama and the music flourish unimpeded.  I realise it caused (and still causes) some controversy, and I am happy  the unnecessary canoodling between Kurwenal and Brangaene has been toned down so that it is no longer obtrusive. ( I didn't see the point, but that was my only criticism of the production).


As I said when I wrote about this production last time, nothing much 'happens' in TRISTAN UND ISOLDE, in terms of stage business.....the first act is narrative, the exposition....and, crucially, it is about Isolde's misunderstanding of her own feelings, not being able to admit that she doesn't hate Tristan, she loves him with a deep passion, and this is why she sees death as the only way out. And how eloquently Nina Stemme conveyed all the tangled complications of Isolde's feelings - angry, passionate, almost hysterical at times, and bitterness at the beginning of her confrontation with Tristan It isn't only that she has a beautiful voice, she brings such commitment to the characterisation of Isolde, the storms of emotion that batter her soul. At the beginning of the opera, she is wearing a white (wedding?) dress, then changes into black for her confrontation with Tristan. The simplicity of the costumes (for all the characters) is another characteristic of this production.






What I have said about Nina Stemme in fact applies to all the performers - they all meshed wonderfully together, with excellent rapport, and all were experts at characterisation. Sarah Connolly in beautiful voice as Brangaene, her mezzo a perfect foil to the soprano of Nina Stemme, and a very sympathetic, warm character, who obviously has her own ideas as to how deep-rooted Isolde's aversion to Tristan really is.




Stephen Gould distinguished himself as Tristan, rising to heights of intensity   especially in the delirious ravings of Act III, almost frightening, it was so believable. He also created a good balance of tenderness and passion during the Love Duet . I love this image from Act II - she starts setting the table for them, but then they get so involved in their discussion of the nature of love that they forget about it....

Iain Patterson was good as Kurwenal, bluff, soldierly, managing to convey his dislike of Isolde (and Brangaene) with body language as much as tone of voice. But - I am very much afraid we are witnessing the beginning of John Tomlinson's vocal decline. True, the shakiness of his voice did add to the poignancy of King Marke's lament (I always grieve for King Marke, whom Wagner portrays as a much more noble character than his counterpart in the medieval sources). But he just no longer has the ringing sonority he had when he was in his prime, although he did convey very movingly the idea of an older man crushed by grief. Think how sad it is for him - he loved and admired Tristan, he adored Isolde, even though he had apparently never tried to consummate the marriage.....and they repay him like this.

I have to say that this time I was rather disappointed with Pappano's conducting of the Prelude, it seemed rather hesitant and tentative, and didn't immediately plunge you into the world of strange chromaticism that Tristan and Isolde inhabit. But I can't fault the orchestral playing in later Acts - the Love Duet opens out onto a plateau of utter gorgeousness. (Pity about the idiot behind me who had FORGOTTEN TO TURN OFF THEIR PHONE).

I'll finish with an extract from Swinburne's TRISTRAM OF LYONESSE which he could not have written without Wagner. (Probably reading Swinburne's version wasn't the best way to come down from my Wagner-induced high, but there you are!!)

And with strong trembling fingers she strained fast

His head into her bosom; till at last
Satiate with sweetness of that burning bed,
His eyes afire with tears, he raised his head
And laughed into her lips; and all his heart
Filled hers; then face from face fell, and apart
Each hung on each with panting lips, and felt
Sense into sense and spirit in spirit melt.
   "Hast thou no sword? I would not live till day,
O love, this night and we must pass away,
It must die soon, and let not us die late."
   "Take then my sword and slay me; nay, but wait
Till day be risen; what, wouldst thou think to die
Before the light take hold upon the sky?"
   "Yea, love; for how shall we have twice, being twain,
This very night of love's most rapturous reign?
Live thou and have thy day, and year by year
Be great, but what shall I be? Slay me here;
Let me die not when love lies dead, but now
Strike through my heart: nay, sweet, what heart hast thou?
Is it so much I ask thee, and spend my breath
In asking? nay, thou knowest it is but death.
Hadst thou true heart to love me, thou wouldst give
This: but for hate's sake thou wilt let me live."

Friday, 5 September 2014

Edinburgh Festival, 2014 - Part 1

I attended these performances at the Edinburgh Festival in August 2014. This is 'emotion recollected in tranquility, since I saw them a week ago, and have only now found time to write them up.






Monday 25 August   Queen's Hall

Music from Terezienstadt/Terezin



Anne-Sofie von Otter      mezzo-soprano
Daniel Hope                    violin
Bengt Forsberg               piano
Bebe Risenfors                accordion/double bass/guitar

The tragedy of Terezin - artistic flowering in defiance of the wretched circumstances.The  Nazis used this as propaganda, but, as a survivor later stated - 'they knew they were going to kill us anyway, so they just let us get on with it - dancing under the gallows'. It is heart-breaking to reflect how many gifted artists, musicians and writers were  cut off in their prime, 

Anne Sofie von Otter has also made a CD commemorating the musicians of Terezin - the programme was a selection of the music written by the inmates, mainly songs. but also some extracts of chamber music. I particular liked the Serenade for Violin and Piano by Robert Dauber (1922-1945).

The group also performed music by the best-known inmates of Terezin, Viktor Ullmann and Pavel Haas, both murdered by the Nazis in 1944.  I was especially impressed by Ullmann's STURMLIED, a setting of a poem by Ricarda Huch, with a very Schumann-like piano postlude. I have included a clip of Susanna Proskura singing this, as there doesn't appear to be one of Anne-Sofie von Otter.




Another piece that particular struck most of the audience was the bitterly ironic anonymous TEREZIN-LIED, based on a song from Emmerich Kalman's Countess Maritza, relating how everyone enjoys their life in their beloved Theresienstadt.....

Finally, I will draw attention to the beautifully simple and moving songs by Ilse Weber 1903-1944. The recital started with the heart-rending ICH WANDRE DURCH THERESIENSTADT. (This version is sung by Bente Kahan, and has English subtitles).




And here is Anne Sofie von Otter singing Weber's WIEGALA - a lullaby which she is said to have sung as she voluntarily accompanied the children she was caring for on their final journey to Auschwitz.




Sunday, 6 July 2014

MARIA STUARDA, Royal Opera House, 5 July 2014




Gaetano Donizetti MARIA STUARDA, Royal Opera House Covent Garden, 5 July 2014


Cast

Queen Elizabeth I                                           Carmen Gianattasio
(Elisabetta)

George Talbot, Earl of Shrewsbury            Matthew Rose
(Giorgio Talbot)

William Cecil, Lord High Treasurer             Jeremy Carpenter
(Guglielmo Cecil)

Robert Dudley, Earl of Leicester                 Ismael Jordi
(Roberto, Conte di Leicester)

Hanna Kennedy, Maria's maid                    Kathleen Wilkinson
(Anna)

Mary Queen of Scots                               .     Joyce DiDonato
(Maria Stuarda) 

Executioner                                                       Peter Dineen 

 Protestors, Courtiers, Politicians, Crowd

 Chorus and Orchestra of the Royal Opera House

Conductor                                                                                  
 Bertrand de Billy

Directors                                                                                   
 Moshe Leiser and Patrice Caurier  





Mary Queen of Scots







Queen Elizabeth I



I will begin by explaining something of the background in case people are not familiar with Schiller's play The opera is a very condensed version of the play, reducing it to a few essential scenes, and of course concentrating on the confrontation between the Queens. The whole first act of Schiller's play is set in Maria's prison in Fotheringay, and contains a scene in which she confronts Paulet, the gaoler, and further scenes in which her own history is gradually revealed - including the fact that she was complicit in the murder of her husband, Darnley. 

Donizetti's opera dispenses with all this and starts with what in Schiller's play is the second Act, introducing Elizabeth and her courtiers as she decides whether to accept the marriage proposal of the Dauphin of France - and is faced with a more immediate decision.....what should be the fate of Mary Stuart. The scene ends, as in Schiller, with Leicester urging her to agree to meet with Maria.


The compression means that the open of Scene II is our FIRST introduction to Maria:  the scene begins with her thinking nostalgically  of her happy childhood in France. Elizabeth and her entourage arrive almost immediately, and it is now that the confrontation takes place - with disastrous consequences for Maria. 


Schiller's final scene is also omitted, and the opera ends with Maria's execution. Schiller's dramatic purpose was rather different from Donizetti's - our sympathies are with Maria, BUT at the end Elizabeth is left alone, everyone has deserted her, even Leicester, and Lord Shrewsbury resigns as her Chancellor. She has done what she had to do, but it has cost her everything.


So after this short preamble - what of last night's performance? It was a stunning triumph for Joyce DiDonato, and both she and Carmen Giannatasio shone in the confrontation scene - the point is that Maria throws her life away for the sake of insulting Elizabeth, and DiDonato's Maria obviously felt that it was worth it! I will never forget the soaring high notes on which she sang 'Vil bastarda!' Or the venom with which Elizabeth responds that Maria has effectively signed her own death warrant.






Donizetti has reduced the number of male characters, and the ones that remain are also rather undifferentiated - I imagine this must have been his intention, in order to focus on the rival queens. This being said, I found that all three male characters that remain were well performed, with Matthew Rose as a sympathetic Talbot, Ismael Jordi as Leicester a smooth-voiced tenor. 


The execution scene is the scene is which the mezzo-soprano really comes into her own,  it has all been building up to this.  I especially loved her rendering of the Confession. (Quando di luce rosea/il giorno a me splendea....) This is why Donizetti omits Schiller's last scene, as he didn't want to divert attention from the vocal splendours and pathos of the execution scene.


I will say a few words about the staging, as it has given rise to a certain amount of controversy. Well actually it gave rise to an absolutely disgraceful outbreak of booing, which was completely unjustified. It isn't a brilliant production - it is minimalist, and I like this as it enables us to concentrate on the psychological drama and the interaction between the protagonists - the confrontation between the Queens is the high point of the opera, and we don't need to be distracted from that.


The stage is almost bare, and everyone except the two Queens is in modern dress. This is another way of underlining their status as heroines.....but also their isolation.




As you can see here, Elizabeth has removed her wig - this is a reference to the historical Elizabeth, who towards the end of her life did always appear in public wearing a red wig and an elaborate farthingale - like many absolute monarchs, inspiring her subjects with respect.  

As I've already indicated, Donizetti reduced the number of male characters, and here they appear as 'men in suits'.

Mary's prison is even more sparse, and the execution chamber does present a bleak aspect - surely it SHOULD look like this, with the harsh light falling on the victim!




The execution scene also contained a poignant touch of realism - Maria is made to discard her heavy velvet dress, so she is standing there in her shift, and then the executioner CUTS HER HAIR - this is so sad, as she stands there feeling her bare neck.





So I was really shocked and horrified when the booing started - the boos were directed at the production team, as everyone had, quite rightly, been loud in their applause for the performance, especially for the heroine of the evening, Joyce DiDonato. It wasn't a bad production, although it wasn't brilliant either - it was designed to emphasise the salient points of this psychological drama, and worked reasonably well. I tried to remonstrate with one of the ringleaders, but to no avail. 


My advice then? Go to HEAR this anyway, even if you don't want to SEE it!! 

Monday, 16 June 2014

People's Assembly, March Against Austerity. June 21

You are invited to join the March Against Austerity convened by the People's Assembly.









Monday, 9 June 2014

The garden today, 9 June 2014


Blackcurrant sage - beautiful scent!




I just love these violas!




Rose Saints Felicite et Perpetuee